Charles Lipson

Peter B. Ritzma Professor Emeritus

University of Chicago

Frequent contributor: 
Real Clear Politics
Spectator | World
The Telegraph
Wall Street Journal

The Trump-Zelensky meetings offered a show of Western unity

Did Pres. Trump make any progress toward ending the war in Ukraine after successive meetings with Vladimir Putin, Volodymyr Zelensky, and key NATO partners? The short answer is “yes, but it’s very slight, and there are still formidable obstacles, which could block a final deal.” The biggest obstacles are Ukraine agreeing to cede sovereign territory and Russia agreeing to the presence of a combined European-American military force within Ukraine, meant to prevent another Russian attack. The joint military force is the most important proposal to emerge from yesterday’s meeting.

Trump’s shrewd move in DC will resonate across the US

President Trump’s initiative to restore law and order to the streets of the nation’s capital is a smart political move. All Americans consider Washington “our city,” and we want it safe. We can see on the nightly news that it is not, and we’re not happy about it. If Trump can turn that around, he will get well-deserved credit, not from the legacy media but from the public.Trump and his party will reap a second major benefit, as well. If he can lessen the muggings, car jackings and armed robberie...

At Columbia, Trump has won a major victory for Western values

Columbia University has just agreed to a massive $220 million settlement with the Trump administration after a fight that centred around rampant anti-Semitism on campus. The university has also agreed to a number of policy reforms, designed to limit future attacks on Jewish students and faculty.Of the settlement, $200 million will go to the federal government and the remaining $20 million to settle employment discrimination claims. Separately, the university has suspended or expelled students wh...

Fordow in a fortnight?

Pres. Trump’s decision to postpone bombing Iran’s underground nuclear-weapons facility at Fordow is not a mark of indecision. It is a prudent move since this is the most consequential decision of Trump’s presidency. Militarily, the pause allows the final US carrier strike group to arrive from the Pacific and for Israel to further degrade Iran’s ability to strike some 40,000 US troops in the region. Politically, it gives Trump a chance to show Americans and our European allies that the US has acted deliberately, not rashly, and given the Islamic regime every opportunity to relinquish its nuclear weapons program.

What to do about Iran?

Iran seems determined to keep its nuclear program and missile systems. It is running out the clock on negotiations with the US to do it. Trump surely knows that and has repeatedkt said an Iran nuclear enrichment program is unacceptable. Israel fears an Iranian nuke could lead to a second Holocaust, esp. if the Islamic regime is collapsing. The hard and dangerous problems are, “What will the US do? Will Israel act militarily if the US does not and refuses to help?”

Joe Biden’s cognitive decline is the biggest scandal in modern US history

Biden’s cognitive decline is not one scandal but three interlocking ones. The first, obviously, is the president’s declining mental capacity, especially in his final two years. The second is the deliberate cover-up by White House aides, senior Democrats, and, inexcusably, the mainstream media. The third is the unanswered question of who was really making consequential decisions in the Biden WH. Together, these form the greatest scandal in modern American political history.

Trump is the unlikely heir to Franklin Delano Roosevelt

Donald Trump is moving faster than any US president since Franklin Delano Roosevelt took office in 1933 amid the Great Depression. Indeed, it was FDR’s rapid action that led observers to mark each administration’s “first 100 days”. Believe me, nobody did that with Calvin Coolidge.At least three major similarities have emerged between Trump and FDR.Both rapidly enacted dramatic – often erratic – changes in national policy, which disoriented investors and disrupted their plans for capital expendit...

PBS and NPR should never have received public funding

The debate about partisan bias at PBS and NPR is important – the bias itself is obvious – but that’s not the most important point. What matters most is that democratic governments have no business funding or controlling news channels directed at their own citizens. Those channels should be privately owned…There is no way a Republican-controlled House and Senate will keep pouring money into networks they believe hate them. They know that hatred is warmly reciprocated.Congress has been mulling the...
Load More

Subscribe free for my latest articles.